Recession and Budget Cuts Double Whammy on Golden State’s Women

Today, the Women’s Foundation of California and the California Budget Project released a joint paper, Falling Behind: The Impact of the Great Recession and the Budget Crisis on California’s Women and Their Families. Major takeaways from the report include:

  • Single mothers were hardest hit by the recession and recent budget cuts contributed to sharp increases in poverty. The employment rate for California’s single mothers dropped by 10.4 percent from 2007 to 2010.
  • Older women (over age 65) also experienced an increase in poverty.
  • Both groups of women bore the brunt of repeated budget cuts – to Medi-Cal, to child care, to income supports (SSI/SSP, CalWORKs grants).
  • Budget cuts have reduced access to higher education for women seeking to gain skills needed to obtain higher wage jobs. Between 2007-08 and 2010-11, enrollment in community colleges declined by 129,612 students with 81.6 percent of this decline being women. Jean Ross, Executive Director of the California Budget Project, speculated that reductions in evening class offerings and career technical classes might explain the precipitous drop in enrollment among women at community colleges.

The report provides significant food-for-thought for state and local policy makers heading in to another year of difficult budget cuts – particularly with the proposals for CalWORKs, child care and Medi-Cal proposed by Governor Brown.

The report also served as testimony to a joint hearing of the Legislature this afternoon of Senate Human Services Committee, Assembly Budget Subcomittee No. 1 on health and human services, and the legislative Women’s Caucus. The Women’s Foundation of California will be using the report to begin organizing grassroots and local dialogue and to engage policy makers about the pending budget cuts.

Your District’s Party Registration

No “party time” puns, I promise.

The law requires the Secretary of State to release registration numbers as of 154 days before statewide elections. She released them today.

You can read in all the other news reports about how many Republicans there are, how many decline-to-state voters, yaddah, yaddah. But what you won’t hear from the news is that the Secretary’s report also breaks down registration by Supervisorial district.

That’s right, you can check out the party registration in your district (or your boss’s district). Not that I’m suggesting local races aren’t nonpartisan. The report also shows registration by Assembly and Senate districts, Congressional seats, and cities, all available in pdf and spreadsheet formats.

Experience the fun for yourself here.

 

Paul McIntosh Profile

Courtesy of Capitol Morning Report  www.capitolmr.com

Paul McIntosh

By Pamela Martineau, Capitol Morning Report

Paul McIntosh, executive director of the California State Association of Counties, likens his love of counties to Tommy Lasorda’s love for the Dodgers. “If you cut me,” McIntosh riffs on the famous Lasorda quote, “I bleed counties.” McIntosh may come to rely on that passion in coming months as he and others at CSAC help California’s 58 counties wade through some of the biggest shifts in policy the local governments have experienced in years.

Gov. Jerry Brown wants to “let the Kernites be Kernites and the Modocians be Modocians.” Or put another way, he’d like to give counties (including Kern and Modoc) more local control. A huge part of that shift is giving counties supervision over non-violent felons who previously would have gone to state prison. It is dubbed realignment and McIntosh says that on Brown’s first full day in office – on Jan. 4, 2011 – the governor visited the CSAC offices on K St. and rolled out his proposal. “He spent an hour and a half here talking with us about his philosophy,” says McIntosh. “He ran on a campaign where he wanted to divest responsibility from the state and bring it back down to the local government.” The shift to local control gives counties greater autonomy in crafting plans to better rehabilitate felons and protect the public, says McIntosh, but the shift will cost big bucks during an era of cutbacks. “From the very first day we talked about the need for some constitutional protections and guaranteed funding,” says McIntosh. Those proposed protections have gone through various iterations over the past year, from a proposed constitutional amendment which failed to get the required votes in the Legislature to put it on the ballot to CSAC gearing up to run its own initiative. CSAC board of directors decided to drop the initiative effort earlier this month after another pep talk by Brown (first at The Broiler restaurant, then the next day at the CSAC offices) in which Brown asked the association to support his sales-tax initiative, which contains language with constitutional and funding guarantees for counties. And if that initiative fails? “The Governor has pledged that if his initiative fails, he will come right back and help us gain the constitutional protections we need, up to, and including, calling a special election,” says McIntosh.

To help counties craft the policies needed to implement realignment, CSAC, the Chief Probation Officers of California and the California State Sheriff’s Association are offering seminars in counties up and down the state where officials share tips on how to develop strong probation and rehabilitation models for parolees. Most counties are embracing the shift, says McIntosh. “But there are some counties that still want to follow an incarceration model,” he adds, declining to name the counties. “I think we’ve already proven that an incarceration model won’t work. We can’t afford it and we don’t have enough room and people to lock everybody up.”

As if realignment weren’t a big enough policy shift for CSAC, other large issues loom. CSAC is helping counties grapple with the proposed $1 billion in cuts to social services in Brown’s budget. County auditors/controllers also will oversee the local dissolution of redevelopment agencies, since they control the allocation of tax monies to districts.

McIntosh, 60, says he loves the challenges of his job. He “bleeds counties,” as he likes to say, because they are where the “rubber hits the road” as far as policy playing out in the lives of people. He grew up in Indiana and joined the Navy in 1970 and served in Vietnam. He earned his undergraduate degree in public administration and a master’s degree in public affairs, both from Indiana University. He interned as a graduate student in DC at what was then the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. After graduate school, his wife, Sue Hegedus, an educator, wanted to move to California. (“She liked the mountains,” he says.) In California, McIntosh initially worked for a management consulting firm in the Bay Area doing needs assessments for counties. “I discovered California counties and I fell in love with the local government concept,” he says. His first formal job with a county was as a deputy in the County Administrator’s Office in Solano County in 1982 where he helped craft the nation’s first variable rate certificates of participation to fund a new criminal justice center. The COP’s allow jurisdictions to issue short term bonds with much lower interest rates that change weekly. McIntosh served as CAO of El Dorado County from 1988 to 1995, worked for an executive recruiting firm for a couple of years, then did two stints working as a county executive outside of California – from 1998 to 2000 in Arizona and from 2000 to 2002 in Florida. McIntosh, his wife and two adult children, came back to California in 2002 when McIntosh accepted a position as CAO of Butte County, a job he held until he was recruited to head up CSAC in 2007. McIntosh says the CSAC gig is the “pinnacle of his career.”

An avid golfer and photographer (some of his pictures hang in his office). McIntosh lives outside Paradise in Butte County and commutes to Sacramento each day. Contact: pamela@capitolmr.com.

 

State Senate Maps Supremely Validated

The California Supreme Court confirmed that this year’s elections will make use of the maps drawn by the citizens redistricting commission. Today’s decision is here.

A group called Fairness and Accountability in Redistricting (or FAIR, which is good thinking on someone’s part), requested that the Court — just for the 2012 election — either retain the state Senate maps drawn in 2001 or else create new Senate maps out of every two adjacent Assembly districts (Assembly districts drawn by the same commission). The group also offered a third possibility: that the Court impose districts based on a maps drawn by the plaintiff’s consultant. Fair enough.

FAIR is widely reported to be a Republican-backed group (though its website goes to some length to describe itself and its mission as nonpartisan), and the California Republican Party chairman has repeatedly complained about the Senate maps. Most political consultants believe the new maps give Democrats a good chance of obtaining a 2/3 majority in the upper house.

FAIR has submitted signatures to overturn the commission’s Senate maps by referendum, and they argued before the Court that the new maps should be held up because their referendum was “likely to qualify” and therefore the new maps should be held until the voters decided the question.

Many county election offices opened on Sunday of a holiday weekend just to receive the referendum petitions, giving proponents an extra couple days to collect signatures. Even so, the signature count was low enough and the random sample of invalid signatures high enough that county election offices now must fully verify every signature submitted, a costly and time consuming process.

As the Court notes in its decision, “If the referendum qualifies, the new maps will automatically be stayed, presenting the questions of what Senate districts should be used for the 2012 primary and general elections of the state Senate.”

If a referendum qualifies and thereby automatically stays the use of the new maps, the decision of which maps to use in the interim is up to the California Supreme Court. In making that choice, they consider which maps are available and which are most constitutional. The Court’s decision today concluded that the commission’s maps fit those criteria best.

In short, if the commission’s maps are stayed, the Court orders the interim use of…the commission’s maps!

CSAC Revamps Corporate Associates Program – Hires Director of Corporate Relations

Last fall, CSAC began the process of revamping all of our corporate and sponsorship programs in an effort to increase:

  • private sector participation in CSAC
  • the number of national firms that join and sponsor events
  • the number and quality of interactions we offer corporate and county people to interact with each other
  • revenue generated by this program

We have already taken a number of steps in support of these efforts.  We added new sponsorship opportunities at the Annual Conference in November, engaged key corporate members in discussions regarding proposed changes and reconfigured program staffing. 

As part of a branding study that is near completion, we have worked to better define the value of CSAC membership for the private sector companies who do business with county governments.  The result is that we will be reducing the number of corporate membership levels offered, tying conference participation to all levels of membership and greatly increasing our interactions with our key corporate members. 

In support of these goals, we raised the level of responsibility for the program to that of Director of Corporate Relations and I am very pleased to announce that CSAC has hired John Samartzis to fill that role effective February 1st.  John brings tremendous experience in developing public private relationships.  He has spent the last five years at the National Association of Counties (NACo) overseeing their corporate and sponsorship programs.  During his tenure there he grew their corporate membership, participation and revenue dramatically.  We are extremely fortunate to have John join the CSAC family and look forward to working with him.

We have great expectations for 2012 and raising the elevation of our corporate partners within our organization.