Housing, Land Use and Transportation 03/09/2012
California Environmental Quality Act
SB 984 (Simitian) – Pending
As Introduced on January 30, 2012
SB 984, by Senator Joe Simitian, would, under the California
Environmental Quality Act, require the lead agency, at the
request of a project applicant, to prepare a record of
proceedings concurrently with the preparation and certification
of an EIR. All documents and other materials placed in the record
of proceedings would be required to be posted on, and be
downloadable from, an internet web site maintained by the lead
agency commencing with the date of the release of the draft
environmental impact report. The lead agency would be required to
make available to the public in a readily accessible electronic
format the draft environmental impact report and all other
documents submitted to, or relied on by, the lead agency in the
preparation of the draft environmental impact report.
Additionally, a document prepared by the lead agency or submitted
by the applicant after the date of the release of the draft
environmental impact report that is a part of the record of the
proceedings would be required to be made available to the public
in a readily accessible electronic format within five business
days after the document is released or received by the lead
agency. Finally, the lead agency shall certify the record of
proceedings within five days of its approval of the project.
CSAC, along with other stakeholders, has been working with the
author to address concerns raised by numerous counties. We expect
the bill to be amended prior to the first scheduled hearing to
increase the timeline for preparation of the record of
proceedings from 5 days to 30 days. Further, the bill will
include specific fee language to ensure the lead agency can
recover all costs involved. SB 984 will also include language to
limit the application of these provisions to specific projects
(i.e. statewide and regional significance, etc.) unless there is
consent of the lead agency. There are several additional
amendments pending. We will be seeking input to ensure these
amendments address county concerns.
This bill is in response to requests to apply the AB 900 (Chapter
, Statutes of 2011) and SB 292 (Chapter , Statutes of 2011)
provisions related to judicial review and record of proceedings
to all public works projects. SB 984 is scheduled for hearing on
March 19 before the Senate Environmental Quality Committee.
AB 1549 (Gatto) – Request for Comment
As Introduced on January 25, 2012
AB 1549, by Assembly Member Mike Gatto, would, among other
things, require the Office of Permit Assistance (Office) to
provide information to developers explaining the permit approval
process at the state and local levels, or assisting them in
meeting statutory environmental quality requirements, and would
prohibit the Office or the State from incurring any liability as
a result of the provision of this assistance. The bill would
require the Office to assist state and local agencies in
streamlining the permit approval process, and an applicant in
identifying any permit required by a state agency for the
proposed project. The bill would authorize the Office to call a
conference of parties at the state level to resolve questions or
mediate disputes arising from a permit application for a
development project.
This bill would also require the Office to develop guidelines
providing technical assistance to local agencies for the
establishment and operation of an expedited development permit
process, and would require the guidelines to contain specified
components. The bill would also require the Office, upon
appropriation by the Legislature, to provide grants and technical
assistance to cities, counties, and cities and counties for the
establishment of an expedited development permit process
according to the guidelines. The bill would further require a
city or county that receives a grant to enact an ordinance
adopting an expedited development permit process according to the
guidelines within 10 months of the date of receipt of the
grant.
Further, this bill would also require the Office, in consultation
with the Natural Resources Agency and the California
Environmental Protection Agency, to develop a consolidated
project information form to be used by applicants for commercial
or industrial development projects. The bill would require the
form to collect sufficient information to allow the Office to
determine the state agencies that have permitting requirements
applicable to the development project for which the form was
submitted. This bill would authorize the Office to charge the
applicant fees for the above-described services, not to exceed
the estimated reasonable cost of their provision, and would
require the Office to adopt or amend regulations to provide for
these fees prior to charging or levying them.
The bill would require a city, county with a population of
100,000 or more, upon the request of an applicant, to designate
an administrative entity to serve as the applicant’s single point
of contact with the local agency with respect to all applications
and permits required by the local agency for the applicant’s
commercial or industrial development project. The administrative
entity would be required to provide the applicant information
regarding the status of, and to coordinate the review and
decision-making process with respect to, the applications and
permits required by the local agency for the development
project.
The bill would require the administrative entity, upon the
request of the applicant, to coordinate with the Office regarding
any applications or permits required by the state for the
development project. The bill would authorize a city, county, or
city and county to charge a fee to defray costs incurred by the
administrative entity in providing the above-described services
to the applicant.
AB 1549 is scheduled for a hearing before the Assembly Local
Government Committee on March 21.