CSAC Bulletin Article

State Appellate Court Upholds Cap-and-Trade Program

April 13, 2017

The Court of Appeal has upheld the cap-and-trade program that was part of the California Global Warming Solutions Act, also known as AB 32, adopted in 2006.  The lawsuit, brought by business groups, argued that the cap-and-trade program of selling greenhouse gas emission allowances at auction amounted to a tax. Under Proposition 13, taxes require a two-thirds vote of the Legislature. AB 32 was passed with less than a two-thirds vote and plaintiffs argued that the cap-and-trade program violated Proposition 13.  The Court of Appeal, in a 2-1 opinion, rejected that argument. 

The court found instead that participation in the auction is not mandatory, and therefore cannot be considered a tax.  Rather, a decision to purchase GHG credits at the cap-and-trade auction is a “voluntary decision driven by business judgments as to whether it is more beneficial to the company to make the purchase than to reduce emissions.”  Plaintiffs have until mid-May to decide whether to seek review in the California Supreme Court.

Navigation Term Highlight Sara Floor

Latest CSAC Bulletin

Navigation Term Highlight David Liebler

Where We are Located

Navigation Term Highlight Michael Sweet

County Of The Week:
San Joaquin

Commands